The background to this update can be found in
two previous posts on this blog. I have previously posted email threads related
to the release of my personal information, which the Department of State agreed
to release in 2014, but has continuously refused to follow through.
https://kyoto-inside-out.blogspot.com/2019/06/privacy-act-request-to-usdepartment-of.html
https://kyoto-inside-out.blogspot.com/2019/09/update-on-us-state-department-privacy.html
It seems a foregone conclusion that I will have to file a separate lawsuit against the sociopaths at FOIA, and there are sanctions for contempt if they refuse to obey a court order to release the documents: https://www.justice.gov/archives/usam/eousa-resource-manual-137-sanctions-violating-foia
At present, the government personnel responding to my emails are refusing to sign their names, even though I have explicitly requested that they do sign their names, as per past examples. In the most recent exchanges of the thread starting in August 2020, after providing an extended estimated date of completion in 2025, the person who responded to my request that they sign their name to the email (necessary in the case of a complaint against them, etc.) arbitrarily extended the estimated date of completion another year, to 2026. It’s arbitrary illegal conduct likely carried out with malice in retaliation for my complaining to/about them, but there is no easy way to hold them accountable.
In past email threads posted on this blog, you
can see the following names:
Katrina Wood
Charlotte W. Duckett
Angela Burks
Susan B Gardener
Let me just re-post the email from Ms. Gardner dated October 28m, 2016 stating that :
This is in response to your e-mail below concerning case control number P-2014-09239. The assigned case analyst has advised that the search of the records of the Bureau of Diplomatic Security has been completed and has resulted in the retrieval of no documents responsive to your request. In addition, the search of the records of the American Consulate in Osaka has also been completed and material that may be responsive to your request is pending review. The new estimated completion date is November 2016.
The last person I complained to before emailing the Office of the Inspector General (another sociopath occupying a dysfunctional position in the federal government) was a woman named Kellie N. Robinson. The email response from her office, which specifically complained about the refusal of the FOIA personnel to sign their emails, also lacked a signature.
Ms. Robinson maintains a public profile on SNS in the form of a Facebook account (https://www.facebook.com/kellie.robinson.12139), and served as a Veteran’s Affairs officer in the Obama administration before moving to DOS. She was named in an email as the contact on the FOIA Public Liaison, but the name of the Liaison listed on the webpage was changed from “Natasha Jones” (at least since 2023: https://web.archive.org/web/20231209054032/https://www.doi.gov/foia/foiacenters) in September 2024 (https://web.archive.org/web/20240926174553/https://www.doi.gov/foia/foiacenters) to “Elisabeth W. McCarty” in October 2024 (https://web.archive.org/web/20241007035735/https://www.doi.gov/foia/foiacenters): https://www.doi.gov/foia/foiacenters#:~:text=The%20FOIA%20Public%20Liaison%20reports,between%20you%20and%20the%20agency. Natasha Jones and Elisabeth McCarty are operating more stealthy, with no public profile.
Apparently, the personnel sending the emails refused to sign their names because not only were they arbitrarily setting dates, etc., they were lying about whom was the Liaison at the time, as Jones had already taken over at least 6 months before that email was sent.
I did find other complaints/correspondence listing Ms. Robinson as Liaison as late as April 2023. Those cases, however, seem to pertain to public documentation disclosure requests (dated 2023 from “The Identity Project”: https://papersplease.org/wp/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/IDP-address-change-DOS-13APR2023.pdf and dated 2021 from “Empower Oversight: https://empowr.us/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/2021-12-06-JF-to-DoS-FOIA-Delay-Inquiry.pdf).
My case, on the other hand, is a Privacy
Act request, so enforcement should be much more straight forward, especially
since there were no responsive documents held by the 'Bureau of Diplomatic Security, and responsive documents held by the U.S. Consulate in Osaka were under review, with the review estimated to be completed within a month (of October 28, 2016). It would appear that there are issues regarding court enforcement of the FOIA vis-à-vis the federal government.
Suffice it to say, that the DOS OIG has not
responded to my email, and I suppose I should contact the FOIA OIG as well, but
for now I’m just going to post the entire thread dating from August 2020.
Next step will be back to the District Court of
the District of Columbia...