Nicole Bea Pastoukoff (MI6?, DGSE??): Facebook Messenger Interlude

Decided to throw these screenshots up here without taking the time to comment much, just to show how long and in what manner I had been interacting with this sociopathic suspected intelligence operative over the years on Facebook. 

As I mentioned, she does not speak any Asian languages whatsoever. I don't know whether it has never occurred to her that that might be a thing to do, or some other reason, like having linguistic incompetency serve as an excuse for her pathological disposition regarding some of the subject matter at hand. Needless to say, I suspect the latter. As you can see below, she was stupid and or audacious enough (as a spy) to try and pass off one of her quasi-occult like blog posts related to East Asian languages to me. 

Give us a break, funny-money honey bunny (MI6, DGSE or whatever, she joins the gallery)...

Who is Nicole Bea Pastoukoff? ---- Another suspected MI6/DGSE female operative in Eastern Religions... vis-a-vis Process Theology, Part I

Long time since I've done one of these, and the subject of this post is another intelligence operative working on SNS trying to "control the narrative," so to speak, with respect to any given topic.

I'm very busy will legal proceedings, maybe that is why this woman thought it was her chance to go for the gusto. She is a linguistically incompetent individual that has been trying to create a niche for herself as some sort of Eastern Spiritualism guru or the like. She's like a wannabe Bari Weiss of Zen and Daoism. Go figga.

As you can see below, she operates a blog called:
Buddhism: The Way of Emptiness (https://buddhism-thewayofemptiness.blog.nomagic.uk/) 
There, she describes herself:

My name is Nicole Bea. Formal studies in comparative literature and philosophy at the Sorbonne and the Ecole Normale Supérieure. A Buddhist all of my life and a Zen practitioner since the 90s. A long-standing interest in philosophy, including 25 years devoted to the Kyoto School of Philosophy and East Asian thought.

She's a 'devotee,' 25 years, all for nought.

She has become increasingly annoying with spammy posts in a FB group called Ancient Chinese Philosophies, where she is a Moderator. She aims to channel David Hinton's dubious pseudo-theories on the relationship between Daoism and Chan/Zen Buddhism and had recently spammed a run of about 7-8 posts about certain spurious claims he has made with which she is enamored, in all her shiny ignorance. She like to name drop books or scholars she has read, trying to compensate for her lack of basic requisite skills.

Another individual (i.e., another suspected CIA pseudo-scholar) she promotes is Bret Davis.
She tries to pretend she's into Zen and Daoism while promoting theism and mysticism, is one angle she works. Davis is one of her vehicles for this, and he, in turn, seems to have influenced a scholar from Kyoto University--who had also studied Eckhart and practiced Zen--that Zen was the same as mysticism, or utter words that he has transmitted to that effect.

She has carried this out across a couple of Groups on Facebook, which I will treat in different posts, with the Davis related post taken up here, first, as it is shorter.

Hinton and Davis are, of course, more important than she is, because they are the people with status as academicians that she is tasked with promoting, and their ideas, in turn, reflect the geopolitical machinations of the CIA/MI6/DGSE et al. 

Hinton is a mediocre (at best) translator, and outright horrendous (bastardized translations) at worst. But that is not all, he has written a couple of books beyond translation into scholarly realms that he has a poor grasp up but thinks he has hit on a linguistic trick to make inroads. I actually have had one of his translations on my shelf for many years, which I will now have to compare against another, when I have time.

Ms. Pastoukoff is also involved on the Kyoto School group page as a Moderator, and there she is also engaged in trying to promote the work of an American named Bret Davis. Some of work seems alright, and some not. 

Ms. Pastoukoff claims to have been a Zen practitioner, but she tries to promote philosophers from the Kyoto school who were proponents, to one degree or another, of Jodo-shu (Pure Land) Buddhism or even Christian mysticism. 

Nicole is of African descent who moved from France to England where she is married to an Englishman and has a small family. She has blocked me, at this point, for criticizing her specious posts, so I will have to push back on that, but I've long suspected she was either an MI6 or DGSE operative, so it is time to expose her as such.  

All I have time to do is throw up some screenshots at the moment, as I have to get some sleep. 

The Bret Davis thread:

Page on her blog:

Pages in FB thread (Kyoto School)

MORE TO FOLLOW

 

Meanwhile, these are some videos from my neighborhood of suspected CIA, Mossad et al. intelligence operatives (family members?). Some videos were provided to the police, as these people are stalking and harassing me..

No time to blog of late, due to criminal and civil cases I've had to file to protect my children from racist Japanese police (my ex-wife has family members in the Kyoto Prefectural Police), Child Welfare Center employees, and others. 

Starting with the most recent video, and will have to dig up the others.

My Japanese blog on the nursery school case will soo be joining the dinosaurs... as goo is closing down the service

 Here's the link, again, for posterity's sake:

保育所一揆という関連で、京都市の保育所入所選考等に関する裁判の報告

it will be archived...

Update on continued failure of Department of State to release documents responsive to 2014 FOIA request under the Privacy Act

The background to this update can be found in two previous posts on this blog. I have previously posted email threads related to the release of my personal information, which the Department of State agreed to release in 2014, but has continuously refused to follow through.
https://kyoto-inside-out.blogspot.com/2019/06/privacy-act-request-to-usdepartment-of.html
https://kyoto-inside-out.blogspot.com/2019/09/update-on-us-state-department-privacy.html

It seems a foregone conclusion that I will have to file a separate lawsuit against the sociopaths at FOIA, and there are sanctions for contempt if they refuse to obey a court order to release the documents: https://www.justice.gov/archives/usam/eousa-resource-manual-137-sanctions-violating-foia

 

At present, the government personnel responding to my emails are refusing to sign their names, even though I have explicitly requested that they do sign their names, as per past examples. In the most recent exchanges of the thread starting in August 2020, after providing an extended estimated date of completion in 2025, the person who responded to my request that they sign their name to the email (necessary in the case of a complaint against them, etc.) arbitrarily extended the estimated date of completion another year, to 2026. It’s arbitrary illegal conduct likely carried out with malice in retaliation for my complaining to/about them, but there is no easy way to hold them accountable.

In past email threads posted on this blog, you can see the following names:

Katrina Wood

Charlotte W. Duckett

Angela Burks

Susan B Gardener

Let me just re-post the email from Ms. Gardner dated October 28m, 2016 stating that :

This is in response to your e-mail below concerning case control number P-2014-09239.  The assigned case analyst has advised that the search of the records of the Bureau of Diplomatic Security has been completed and has resulted in the retrieval of no documents responsive to your request. In addition, the search of the records of  the American Consulate in Osaka has also been completed and material that may be responsive to your request is pending review. The new estimated completion date is November 2016. 

The last person I complained to before emailing the Office of the Inspector General (another sociopath occupying a dysfunctional position in the federal government) was a woman named Kellie N. Robinson. The email response from her office, which specifically complained about the refusal of the FOIA personnel to sign their emails, also lacked a signature.

Ms. Robinson maintains a public profile on SNS in the form of a Facebook account (https://www.facebook.com/kellie.robinson.12139), and served as a Veteran’s Affairs officer in the Obama administration before moving to DOS. She was named in an email as the contact on the FOIA Public Liaison, but the name of the Liaison listed on the webpage was changed from “Natasha Jones” (at least since 2023: https://web.archive.org/web/20231209054032/https://www.doi.gov/foia/foiacenters) in September 2024 (https://web.archive.org/web/20240926174553/https://www.doi.gov/foia/foiacenters) to “Elisabeth W. McCarty” in October 2024 (https://web.archive.org/web/20241007035735/https://www.doi.gov/foia/foiacenters): https://www.doi.gov/foia/foiacenters#:~:text=The%20FOIA%20Public%20Liaison%20reports,between%20you%20and%20the%20agency. Natasha Jones and Elisabeth McCarty are operating more stealthy, with no public profile. 

Apparently, the personnel sending the emails refused to sign their names because not only were they arbitrarily setting dates, etc., they were lying about whom was the Liaison at the time, as Jones had already taken over at least 6 months before that email was sent.

I did find other complaints/correspondence listing Ms. Robinson as Liaison as late as April 2023. Those cases, however, seem to pertain to public documentation disclosure requests (dated 2023 from “The Identity Project”: https://papersplease.org/wp/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/IDP-address-change-DOS-13APR2023.pdf and dated 2021 from “Empower Oversight: https://empowr.us/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/2021-12-06-JF-to-DoS-FOIA-Delay-Inquiry.pdf). 

My case, on the other hand, is a Privacy Act request, so enforcement should be much more straight forward, especially since there were no responsive documents held by the 'Bureau of Diplomatic Security, and responsive documents held by the U.S. Consulate in Osaka were under review, with the review estimated to be completed within a month (of October 28, 2016). It would appear that there are issues regarding court enforcement of the FOIA vis-à-vis the federal government. 

Suffice it to say, that the DOS OIG has not responded to my email, and I suppose I should contact the FOIA OIG as well, but for now I’m just going to post the entire thread dating from August 2020.

Next step will be back to the District Court of the District of Columbia...

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Results of complaint to Japan Fair Trade Commission against Human Global Communications, Inc. and Kyoto City

 I don't have time to blog much at present, so a brief update.

In response to the complaint and evidence I submitted, some of which is posted in previous entries on this blog, the FTC issues the two notices below.

In short, they found that Human Global Communications had engaged in problematic behavior with respect to the Anti-Monopoly Act, etc., but that it was difficult to implement measures against such companies, so they were not sanctioned.

Meanwhile, though the FTC acknowledged the problematic conduct in the form of the low bid, etc., they did not find that Kyoto City violated the law by accepting that low bid, which is somewhat less than satisfactory. I would have expected the FTC to also call out Kyoto City for accepting a bid that could reasonably be deemed to be too low (either below cost or selectively below market rate (Japanese legal term:差別的対価), but they simply stated that Kyoto City did not violate the law.

I have other issues to bring up with the FTC, so this theme will be continued.

 

The Disclosed English Translation of the Article Kyoto City is Currently Refraining from Publishing from "京都 Innovation Studio Session Vol. 7"

Since I am at the blog desk, let me post this article now.
This translation was also obtained through a request for disclosure of public documents, as it is one of three Japanese-to-English translations that Kyoto City paid Human Academy Inc. to produce, as per the documents pertaining to the tender I posted yesterday. The city government agreed to provide the documents voluntarily, via email.

Meanwhile, Kyoto City has published the other two pieces, but they have withheld this one, partly for reasons I touched on yesterday (Goldman Sachs et al. finance sector connections, etc.), and will refrain from going into further here. However, I will again post the URL to the original Japanese article, which is still active: 
https://kigyolog.com/interview.php?id=236

Suffice it to say, it is clear, even from the title, that they are making a belabored comparison of Kyoto to Silicon Valley, and trying to market Kyoto as a Silicon Valley competitor of sorts. It's pathetic, of course, but these people wield influence over the government. 

I will post the other two pieces in their pre-edited form eventually, but it remains unclear whether the city ever intends to publish its edited version of this, so I will publish the unedited, public domain document, here.