I have been waiting to discuss the lawsuit against the mayor because
it is a somewhat involved matter and requires time to preset adequately. So,
for the time being, I’ll just elaborate on the possibility of an indirect relationship
between the mayor and the CIA, via their common tool of the burakumin groups
associated with yakuza organized crime groups.
I have already discussed connections between CIA officers and Koreans
and people of burakumin descent that are members (or affiliates) of yakuza
crime groups. With respect to the burakumin in Kyoto, Dan Douglass and Preston
Houser have been discussed in conjunction with the CIA staffed (and student
populated?) “Global College”, in addition to Glenn Paquette and his student
recruits from Kyoto University. Elsewhere, there is the connection between
JapanToday and the former Osaka governor turned mayor, Toru Hashimoto, with
respect to whom they were not only giving some favorable press, but deleting
critical comments by the readership, largely composed of foreign residents.
The current mayor of Kyoto was the head of the department of
education before being elected mayor, in a pattern that repeats that of his
predecessor. He has been sued twice for actions while in the post of head of
the board of education. The largest of the two suits Kadokawa has been ordered
to repay 72 million yen for illicitly paying out public funds in the form of research
grants that were used by favored personnel connected to the board of education
for overseas trips and the like. In another case, he was one of the officials
responsible for conducting invalid elections for officials that were
undemocratic, etc., and illicitly paying to a burakumin support organization
800 million yen of public funds for travel of board of education board personnel
to hot springs resorts, of which it seems he has been ordered to repay 1.17
million yen (from the somewhat vague Wikipedia description).
These pages are in Japanese, but eventually I will post details in
English, once I have time to translate portions of a book that has been
published in relation to this topic.
A somewhat more detailed account:
At any rate, he was also the head of the department of education at
a time when illegal criteria for use in the selection process for determining
entrance into nursery schools were implemented, while at the same time, a law
suit similar to the one I have filed was being conducted in the city of Higashi
Osaka, which the city lost resoundingly, and didn’t even bother to appeal.
This is in Japanese (日本語のサイト), but here is an analysis of that case:
東大阪市保育所入所保留処分国家賠償請求事件について
This is in Japanese (日本語のサイト), but here is an analysis of that case:
東大阪市保育所入所保留処分国家賠償請求事件について
The school in our neighborhood which I had to sue to get us into is
attended by the children of several other foreign residents, with Dave Dalsky’s
daughter attending once a week on a part time attendance program they have.
To cut to the chase, although I had moved into the apartment a year
ago, I had never seen Dave and his daughter at the riverside until about 2
months ago. Our son started attending the nursery school in April, about 4
month ago.
The letter that finally arrived from the DoJ, after more than eight
months had passed since initiated the complaint, arrived in the second week of
May.
Although I didn’t make much of it until reflecting on the subsequent
bizarre behavior of Dalsky, there is a phrase in the letter that makes it sound
like my complaint was trifling and bordering on irrational. That phrase reads,
“You further state that the CIA and their agents have infringed your
rights and used propaganda against your blog.”
First, the letter does mention that I sent a substantial number of
pages of faxes (76 on one occasion), without mentioning that I subsequently
doubled that amount in emails sent to an address for the Special Litigation
Department of the Criminal Division of the DoJ that the paralegal named K. Callahan
eventual provided me, the letter is dismissive and doesn’t address the main
complaints, or mention any actions that have been taken against the
perpetrators, such as Glenn Paquette, who had been “retired” from the
university, for example. Bear in mind that not only was Glenn Paquette retired
from Kyoto University, but from academia in general, as he had also been
teaching at Brown University and University of N.C. Chapel Hill, and now he has
a company in Minnesota called, Paquette Research & Language:
Sasha Peterka is also no longer connected to academia, apparently,
and has deleted his facebook page, etc.
At any rate, I had been mulling this scenario over when Dalsky
appears on the scene, thinking maybe this was a positive sign. However, he evinced
the same type of subterfuge of hostility in the form of untoward comments of a subtle
psychologically caustic nature, while not seeming to know that I had been
causing certain CIA officers substantial problems, terminal problems, at least
as far as their careers in academia were concerned. So, as I mentioned, after I
broached the issue of intelligence officers and a case pending with the DoJ, he
dropped out of site for a couple of weeks.
When he reappeared, as I have described in an earlier entry, he was
acting somewhat disturbed, and claimed that he was suffering from bipolar
disease, offering to share his medications—two or three different types—eventually
asking that I return them because they were expensive at 500 yen apiece. He
seems to have been seeking to gain my sympathy for his being ill, and for his
not having any money because his wife was in charge of the funds and they were
on a tight budget.
Next, the story of his apparent breakdown at the university, where
he says he pulled a fire alarm because he feared that the Chinese students were
spying on him. That story was told somewhere in the flow of conversation where
I had mentioned intelligence operatives again, just to keep him aware of the
fact that I was only listening to his performance for the sake of hearing him
out, basically.
From there, however, he seemed to be implying that I might be
delusional, like him (and didn’t I want to seek treatment or try some of his
medication, etc.), after responding that the Chinese student weren’t really
spying on him in response to my question as to why he thought that the Chinese
students would want to spy on him.
That is the point that I want to focus on here in conjunction with
the appearance of Eric Bray, and the context of the ensuing court date for the
law suit that enabled me to gain admittance in the first place.
First, why would an unaccomplished English teacher like Eric Bray
(BA in psychology from UC Santa Cruz) try to give me his loser sob story about
his failed marriage and disappointing son to convince me in a psychologically
manipulative way that I didn’t really want to send my children to the schools
in the neighborhood, even though there has been a public television documentary
made about them.
Second, after I receive a letter from the DoJ which basically
attempts not only to deny the merit of my claims, but insinuates that I have
made superfluous and perhaps irrational claims about the CIA “using propaganda against
my blog”, an individual with a PhD in psychology appears and starts trying to
manipulate me psychologically, eventually trying to convince me that the CIA is
not spying on me, while he himself is almost certainly an officer in the CIA.
Let me rephrase that:
if, as I suspect, Dave Dalsky is a CIA officer,
the scenario is accordingly one characterized by the fact that
a CIA officer was trying to convince me that I was delusional in asserting that the CIA had been harassing me, intruding and interfering with my life, spying on me in the form of hacking my computer, etc.
In short, that is a form of
psychological warfare,
of a very disturbing sort.
Moreover, it is a demonstration of the same type of hyper duplicitous disposition based on a subterfuge of hostility that spurred me to tell Glenn Paquette that I would kill him, twice.
Let me rephrase that:
if, as I suspect, Dave Dalsky is a CIA officer,
the scenario is accordingly one characterized by the fact that
a CIA officer was trying to convince me that I was delusional in asserting that the CIA had been harassing me, intruding and interfering with my life, spying on me in the form of hacking my computer, etc.
In short, that is a form of
psychological warfare,
of a very disturbing sort.
Moreover, it is a demonstration of the same type of hyper duplicitous disposition based on a subterfuge of hostility that spurred me to tell Glenn Paquette that I would kill him, twice.
These people either have an extremely inflated opinion of themselves
and their abilities, or they think that I am psychologically weak and
susceptible to such ploys.
What is most disturbing, of course, is the apparent complicity of
the DoJ in this ploy, in the form of the ludicrous response that they have
supplied. I have already posted several pages of the documents that I have
faxed to them, and will be posting more in the near future.
The DoJ response amounts to an attempt to provide further cover to the CIA, not to redress illegal activity on the part of its officers.
The DoJ response amounts to an attempt to provide further cover to the CIA, not to redress illegal activity on the part of its officers.
Well, I will be reporting the actions of Mr. Dalsky to the Kyoto
police, and requesting that they investigate, particularly with respect to his
attempt to provide me with anti-psychotic medications. That in itself is
probably a felony here, but if he is in fact suffering from bipolar disease, maybe that will be taken into consideration.
And that leads to the conclusion that, if you can fake it, mental health issues might provide a modicum of cover for an intelligence operative.
And that leads to the conclusion that, if you can fake it, mental health issues might provide a modicum of cover for an intelligence operative.
No comments:
Post a Comment